Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:54
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What are the gifts you got when you cleared JEE ?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
🎀 Pinterest trend; search kpop mother, father, wife, husband, kid
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Chevy’s C8 Corvette ZR1 Supercar Is Even Faster Than It Expected - Robb Report
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Scientists May Have Just Discovered the First Ever Pieces of Mercury - The Daily Galaxy
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Biotech pauses trial after second patient death linked to gene therapy - The Washington Post
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why do untreated borderlines always blame their partners when they actually think they are normal?